patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

More than Half of People Deported from County Not Convicted With Any Crime

Trend points to collaboration between police and immigration enforcement, say advocates, who are pushing for a new ordinance that would bar local law enforcement from assisting immigration authorities in any way

 

Half of all people arrested by federal immigration authorities in Sonoma County in the past two years were never convicted of any crime, according to an analysis of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) statistics done by Petaluma Patch.

Out of more than 500 people arrested or booked into ICE custody from October 2008 through September 2010, 286 were labeled non-criminal, despite being apprehended under ICE's Secure Communities program, a new effort aimed at rooting out violent criminal aliens.

See table on the right

Additionally, 50 percent of the people deported in the same time period from Sonoma County had no criminal charges against them, documents show.

Immigrant advocates point to the numbers as evidence that Sonoma County Sheriff’s deputies cooperate with federal immigration authorities to stop, question, detain and eventually deport undocumented immigrants whose only crime is being in the U.S. illegally.

California law bars local police agencies from cooperating with federal immigration officials in apprehending illegals, unless a person has committed a crime.

Many undocumented people--typically Latinos--wind up in detention after being stopped during routine traffic stops, such as when someone is pulled over for a broken taillight or for failing to stop at a red light, explains Richard Coshnear, a Santa Rosa immigration attorney who has represented many Latino immigrants.

During a stop, if a deputy suspects that a driver may be illegal or if the person is not able to present a driver's license, he can enter the person's name into the Secure Communities database. This cross references information from the Department of Justice with immigration records. If there is no match, the person is assumed to be illegal and apprehended.

This is what happened to 30-year-old Gloria Lopez Gutierrez who was deported in 2009 after being arrested for driving without a license. Lopez Gutierrez’s church friends gathered enough money to post her bail, but the woman was still kept behind bars because an ICE hold had been placed on her, according to Coshnear.

“People are kept in jail for an extra day or two until ICE comes around and apprehends them," Coshnear said. "The Sheriff’s Department assists ICE in ways in which it is not mandated to do so."

The Sheriff’s Office says that's not true.

“I challenge anyone who says this to show us proof,” said Matt McCaffrey, a spokesman for the Sonoma County Sheriff's Office. “Time and time again, we find there is a reason people are picked up—whether it’s on an outstanding warrant or something else.”

In light of the alleged problem, one group is pushing for an ordinance to prevent county funds from being used to arrest and deport undocumented immigrants, while continuing to assist with the removal of aliens convicted of serious felonies.

A "family unity ordinance" is being spearheaded by the Committee for Immigrant Rights of Sonoma County, an advocacy group that wants to put the issue before the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors as soon as possible.

Several supervisors who could be reached for comment refused to speculate on an ordinance that is not yet on the agenda. But there is evidence that they are not eager to jump into the immigration debate, deferring to state and federal jurisdiction. But if the last election is any indication, "sanctuary" or at least the extent to which local law enforcement cooperates with immigration agents, is an issue on the minds of many voters.

Sonoma County Sheriff's  Office has repeatedly said that it "does not care about immigration status" and just wants to "solve crimes and protect the community."

However, Sheriff's deputies and ICE agents do occasionally work together, such as when ICE accompanies the department's Gang Enforcement unit to locate known gang members who are undocumented, McCaffrey said. 

"They come to us because our guys have pretty good knowledge of where these gang members can be found and will work with us to track those individuals down," he said. "We don't assist them or keep them from making arrests. They are peace officers and can enforce the law."

Federal immigration agents also have a steady presence at the Sonoma County Jail, coming by at least twice a week.

Critics allege many innocent people — usually young Latino men — are apprehended during the course of gang suppression operations by the sheriff's office. Many of these operations focus on heavily Latino communities — where gang problems do exist — and result in racial profiling by officers who question men with shaved heads and tattoos.

"What we've got is a dragnet that's catching young Latino males whether they've committed any crime or not, and setting them up for deportation," Coshnear said.

The sheriff's office vehemently denies the allegation.

"We don't make a stop because we think someone is an illegal alien and we don't engage in racial profiling," McCaffrey said.

The Sheriff's Office says the high number of people who are arrested but never convicted is due to immigration raids.

"After all, you have to ask yourself, 'What is ICE's job?'" McCaffrey said.

But Immigration and Customs Enforcement says that it does not conduct raids in Sonoma County, but instead focuses on "targeted enforcement," whose number one priority is rooting out criminals.

"We are looking at convicted criminal aliens who have been identified for immigration enforcement," said Lori Haley, an ICE spokeswoman. "Our priority is people who have committed the worst crimes, however we can still take enforcement action against people who are in the country illegally."

In 2008, this dispute culminated in a lawsuit against Sonoma County filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California.

One of the plaintiffs is a 23-year-old Latino immigrant named Francisco, who was apprehended by gang detectives while driving in Santa Rosa several years ago.

"The officer ordered me out of the vehicle and asked me if I was a gangster, a Sureno, then if I had any tattoos," said Francisco, who asked that his last name and country of origin not be revealed, pending a lawsuit.

"I told him 'no' about the gangs and 'yes' about the tattoos, and I showed him the tattoo on my shoulder, which says 'Rest in Peace.'" Francisco says it refers to his relationship with a girlfriend.

After Francisco was patted down, he was directed to an ICE agent standing about 15 feet away, he said in a sworn affidavit.

"I knew I didn't want to talk to that ICE officer or answer his questions, but they kept us there and it didn't look like they'd let us leave until I answered his questions," he said.

Francisco was arrested, booked into Sonoma County Jail and then transferred to a detention facility in San Francisco. Heeding his family's advice, he refused to sign anything. Instead, Francisco asked for an immigration judge, who concluded that he had been illegally searched, resulting in charges being dropped.

Many others aren't so lucky and are usually so terrified that they sign a voluntary departure form agreeing to be sent to their home country, Coshnear said.

The Committee for Immigrant Rights of Sonoma County estimates that some 60 families in Sonoma County are affected each month. They don't get a chance to say goodbye to family and friends or collect of any of their belongings before being dropped off at the border, the group claims.

"You get the feeling that in Sonoma County if you are undocumented or you happen to be driving without a license because you can't get one, you have no civil rights," said Mario Funes, 40, a legal immigrant who lives in Rohnert Park and is originally from El Salvador.

Another issue being haggled over in the ACLU lawsuit against the county is immigration holds automatically placed on undocumented immigrants who are detained by law enforcement officials and transported to jail. The ACLU maintains immigration holds on people who have not been charged with a crime are unconstitutional.

"People are sitting in jail, they have no notice of the charges against them and they have no access to a judge," said Julia Harumi Mass, the lead ACLU attorney in the suit against Sonoma County. "There is no probable cause to be holding them and just letting people stew in jail for four days."

The end result is a community terrified--of driving, of going outside, of doing anything that could result in arrest and deportation, advocates say. And even when people need help, they think twice before calling the authorities.

"It is really affecting the trust that Latino people have of the police," Funes said. "People don't want to say anything because they are so afraid."

Related Topics: Immigration and Latino

Patch_comments_icon

Keri Brenner

6:26 pm on Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Very compelling story that affects a lot of people. Well done Karina!

Reply
Comment_arrow

The One

6:53 am on Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Do your research lady as the Karina did not. Calif. Penal Code Sec. 834b

Bob Newkirk

10:41 pm on Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Those that were arrested and or deported did in fact commit a crime.
They entered the US ILLEGALLY, which is a crime.
The balance of what they do or do not do is after a crime has already been committed.
There are no innocent individuals in the act of a committing a crime.

Why is the fact of whom was arrested left out of the story?
There were NO immigrants arrested and deported. In fact there were Illegal Immigrants arrested and deported.
This is a very big difference.

Additionally, the other 50% that in fact had committed additional crimes, would not have been captured if it were not for the valiant efforts of law enforcement.

Which crimes, murders, rapes, DUI's or others are acceptable to give a free pass to the others?

Reply

Ptown

11:03 pm on Tuesday, January 11, 2011

What's funny is this story is very false. I have many friends who are here and are illegal, many for over twenty years. One of them who was just put in the hospital for over a week (he was basically walking home and was beaten, of course he called the police). He is recovering fine, but was never threatened of deportation (his parents actually own a house here). So, NO, let's concentrate on the illegals who are deported, instead of the majority who are allowed here to stay? In Mexico they are also cracking down on those from Guatemala, those from El Salvador etc..... It's just not us.

Reply

Richard Coshnear

8:54 am on Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Research would show you, "The One" [who are you anyway?] that Penal Code section 834b was found unconstitutional by a federal court 15 years ago! It is not the law and cannot justify local police in doing ICE's work.

Reply

Ptown

3:18 pm on Wednesday, January 12, 2011

My first sentence in the earlier post was meant to say the title is false. If you are arrested you most definatly commited a crime, most get their charges dropped when they accept deportation (saving a lot of money) so of course they are never convicted of a crime. If I didn't have a license I would be scared to death of driving also, I'm sure the same people are not scared of walking. Education needs to start at home, if most are unaware of the right to see a mediator judge before deportation than maybe they should get a flier after they are arrested for a crime. That should solve this. If illegal immigrants are so much in fear, why in every city do they congregate in large crowds every morning in public looking for work? Believe me law abiding people here illegaly are very comfortable in Sonoma County. Do some get caught up being around their friends who are wanted gang members etc.... Sadly wrong place wrong time happens to everyone. That is why you can see a judge before you are deported.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Alexis Fitts

5:06 pm on Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Way to create some gang-busters journalism. Really impressed with this piece!

Reply

Marsha Trent

3:24 pm on Sunday, January 16, 2011

Since when is driving without a license a "minor charge," especially if you have committed a federal crime by entering and staying in the country illegally? How many times does someone who is here illegally need to be arrested on "minor charges," before they should be deported? As for the four-day hold to determine whether an undocumented driver is a "legal" citizen, it kinda makes sense because if that person is an illegal immigrant they will not be able to ever get a driver's license legally and therefore may commit more "minor" crimes. Finally, how can illegal immigrants not be classified as criminals? It is a federal crime to enter this country illegally for any purpose and the remedy for that offense is deportation, according to federal immigration law is in not? If it is not, what is the problem? Why can't anybody come into this country, wherever they want, stay as long as they like, drive without a driver's license or commit whatever other "minor" crimes they like and pay fines or serve jail sentences just like the rest of us? If the immigration laws are not working or are not what we want them to be, we should work or changing them, but as long as they are the laws, they should be enforced without regard to the race or nationality of the criminals and as far as I can see all law enforcement should co-operate in that enforcement.

Reply

Al Hawkins

7:29 pm on Thursday, July 21, 2011

First I must respond to the comment by the Sonoma Sheriff's Office that it "does not care about immigration status" it just wants to "solve crimes and protect the community". Must be nice to be able to pick and chose which laws to enforce and which are deemed unworthy. If the truth be known, the reason behind not wanting to bring to bear any responsibility when it comes to illegals is the mind boggling expense in resourses and the political pressure placed on our system in general. I left Napa almost 7 years ago. Before I left I had lunch with two law officers. One with the Highway Patrol, the other a retired Napa policeman. The conversation came around to the great number of Hispanics in the county. They both agreed that they turned a blind eye to a number of minor infractions when an Hispanic was involved because of the great number of illegals and how if found out the officers time, paperwork, court appearances, translators, attornies made their job impossible when there was more serious matters to attend to. I understand their position and I sympathize with them, but we used to be a nation of laws and this "illegal" situation has gotten out of hand simply because of not enforcing the laws years ago.

Reply

Leave a comment