.
Feedback

Should We Create Healthier Babies by Genetic Manipulation?

Scientists can now "create" healthier babies by altering the genetic code of embryos. But even if they tinker with nature, should they?

Many diseases occur as a result of mutations in a particular gene. Some of these mutations can be passed on to future generations. But right now, scientists are working on a particular protocol that could potentially eradicate certain diseases forever.

Can you imagine a world without fatal heart problems, liver failure, brain disorders, blindness and muscular weakness? All of this is potentially possible.

These diseases brought into question include a whole range of mitochondrial diseases and related disorders. If the protocol gets the green light, certain conditions and disorders have the potential to become obsolete, sparing future generations from a host of rare and debilitating conditions.

Mitochondrial illnesses are maternally inherited as the mitochondrial genome is (only) carried in the egg and not in the sperm. So if there’s a genetic mutation on the mitochondrial genome, then this defect is passed from mother to child, resulting in a range of mitochondrial diseases- mostly incurable and afflicting about 1 in 200 children born each year.

The three parent in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedure is being developed and designed to help families from passing on these defective mitochondrial genomes to their offspring. Eggs from the mother, eggs from a female donor and sperm from the father are needed. Hence the term “three parent IVF”.

How does the protocol work? There are several protocols being developed, but two that are gaining some momentum are pronuclear transfer and maternal spindle transfer.

For an easy overview of how these procedures work refer to the pronuclear transfer and  the spindle transfer for a  step by step diagram outline.

Overall, the resulting embryo and child would inherit their genes (and identity) from their mother and father, and that of a female donor (her mitochondrial DNA).

Although the resulting babies would inherit only a small fraction of their DNA from the donor as 37 genes alone are located in the mitochondria, these changes would affect the germ line in all future generations, forever.  That has got people talking.

Although the treatment option is only at research stage in certain university labs in Britain and the United States, the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA) was asked by the British government to "take the public temperature on this important and emotive issue" stated Professor Lisa Jardine, the chair of HFEA.

The public consultation launched in Britain on 17th September 2012, asks the question should "three-parent" fertility treatments be made available to avoid passing on incurable disease?

In other words, just because we can, should we?

"We find ourselves in unchartered territory, balancing the desire to help families have healthy children with the possible impact on the children themselves and wider society….. If this is allowed, it has consequences in perpetuity” ….Immediately alter the nature of society to all eternity" Jardine stated in her release.

This public debate is extremely important and HFEA want to hear from everyone on this matter. The consultation on the HFEA website at www.hfea.gov.uk  is open to anyone.

Contributors are asked to consider a variety of issues related to concepts of identity; how this will affect future generations; safety; the rights of the donor; and who should decide who can access the treatments. The public consultation will run until December 7 and you can explore these issues and weigh in with your views. Now is your chance.

In addition, there will also be two public events held in London and Manchester where people can learn about the technique and register their views.

The result of a survey of 800 people by the Progress Educational Trust found that two thirds supported the use of the technique while a third opposed it, and a report by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics last year claimed the approach would be ethical and safe.

But some pro-life campaigners have already criticized the scientific research. Concerns about creating embryonic children by subjecting them to unnatural processes raises ethical questions. Others worry that modifying embryos to avoid disease could be the first step towards the creation of "designer babies". Questions of “what will this lead to?” are raised.

If the British Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt decides to give the treatment the go ahead, the technique could be written into law as early as next year making Britain the first country in the world to allow human trials.

So, should we or shouldn’t we? And why?

Fenella Das Gupta is a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist ( #47275) working in Northern California,specializing in fertility counseling. She works with individuals and couples as they make their way through the fertility maze. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Petaluma Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Glenn May 22, 2013 at 03:10 pm
You left wing environmental wacos just cant admit when your wrong. IPCC data show no cause andRead More effect between co2 and Global warming. Not to mention we have been in a global cooling period for the last 12 years. Yet you continue with your environmental religion mantra. Unless you own the property you have no say in how it is used. Mind your own business you I*D*I*O*T*S
Steven Maviglio May 22, 2013 at 02:42 pm
Just like they question the science of climate change, the right-wingers funding the Drakes BayRead More Oyster Farm's effort to break their deal with the National Park Service now are questioning the peer-reviewed science that led to the decision to end the marine slime and plastic pollution from the corporation's operation. And hate to break it to the author, but Cause of Action is a right-wing funded legal (tax exempt of course) group that takes on conservative causes, such as this effort to overturn the Obama Administration's correct decision to enforce the deal the Lunny's made.
eileen castelli May 14, 2013 at 08:17 pm
Marin County 4-H Summer Camp week 2 still accepting applications. July 28-Aug. 3, 2013. cost isRead More $230.00 all inclusive. ages 9-14 co-ed. Old fashioned sleep away camp, hiking, nature, games, swimming, archery, arts and crafts, campfires, skits, parties, dances, etc. Marin4Hcamp@aol.com for applications. do not need to be a member of 4-H to attend. Deadline is June 15th or 150 campers are registered. Camp is held Las Posadas Forest in Angwin (Napa County) California http://lasposadas4hcamp.com/marin.html
Donnie Frank May 14, 2013 at 10:27 am
Parks and Recreation has a huge variety of summer camps. Kids Klub (1st-5th grade) and Camp K2Read More (6th-8th grade) are both traditional summer day camps with 1/2 day, daily and weekly options. Also Lego engineering camps, sports camps, film making, cooking, science adventure. Check out our offerings online at www.cityofpetaluma.net/register.html
maria galindo April 22, 2013 at 06:31 pm
Hello there Jennifer, Thank you for posting the Colors of Spanish Summer Spanish Immersion info!Read More Would you be able to post this info also in all Sonoma and Marin County Patches, or do I do that individually in each Patch Summer Camp listing? Thanks, Maria