.

Feinstein: Bills to Ban Assault Weapons Will Be a Priority

The California senator plans to introduce new legislation on the first day Congress is in session

 

Bills to return a ban on assault weapons in the United States will be introduced in both the Senate and House of Representatives on the first day they are in session next month, California Sen. Dianne Feinstein vowed on national television recently.

“We’ve tried to take my bill from ’94 to 2004 and perfect it,” the California Democrat said on NBC's “Meet The Press."

Feinstein authored a federal ban on assault weapons in 1994, a ban that was allowed to expire by Congress during the George W. Bush administration. On NBC last week, Feinstein agreed with gun control proponent New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who said he wants “weapons of war off the streets of our cities.”

California’s senior senator said her lawyers have carefully crafted a constitutional bill that will “exempt over 900 specific weapons that will not ... fall under the bill.”  Feinstein has also promised to "grandfather in" weapons legally possessed on the date of the enactment.

Police have said the children killed in the Newtown, Conn. massacre were shot multiple times in rapid succession using an AR-15, an assault-type of rifle.

Meanwhile, the Press Democrat is reporting an increase in sales at North Bay gun shops in anticipation of a federal crackdown on assault weapons. 

“All you have to do is tell people that they can’t have it and they’ll want it,” one local gun shop owner told the paper. “They are nervous about having their rights taken away from them.”

Are you in favor of a federal ban on assault weapons? Why or why not?

James D'Alessio December 29, 2012 at 11:35 PM
More Rights Are Being Staked , Pretty Soon NAZI AMERICA !
James D'Alessio December 29, 2012 at 11:41 PM
Very Soon People Who Voted For The Democrats Will be Happy , For about 3 Months , And Then What Are You Going To Do When There is NO More Pieces Of THE CONSTITUTION To Take Away , Here is Hitler in 1932 : "The streets of our cities are in turmoil. The universities are filled with students rebelling and rioting. Communists are seeking to destroy our country. Russia is threatening us with her might and the Republic is in danger. Yes, danger from within and without. We need law and order! Yes, without law and order our nation cannot survive ... Elect us and we shall restore law and order. We shall, by law and order, be respected among the nations of the world. Without law and order our Republic shall fail." Adolph Hitler 1932 , before becoming chancellor of Germany He Promised Law and Order Too , After 6 Million Dead , Did We Learn ?
Rev. Raymond James Smithson December 30, 2012 at 03:10 AM
I firmly say the Govt all of them are red as hell, we will die for freedom I hope,,, my mom would say to me yrs. ago, " don't trust no one on the govt payroll"
George Barich December 30, 2012 at 04:00 PM
I was in college in San Francisco when Feinstein was mayor in the early 1980s. She helped pass a handgun ban in San Francisco. It was all over the news and was a disaster and public relations nightmare for her and SFCA. In the following week, some 20 or so guns total were turned into the police department. It was a complete waste of time and political stunt. She knows this new law won't work either. She is just preying on the emotions of the sheeple, once again.
George Barich December 30, 2012 at 04:02 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjdyNB_czuk
Active Thinker December 31, 2012 at 06:43 AM
Hitler? Oh my. These type of guns don't belong. The right of the people to ?? Things change...slavery was legal then too...and women could not vote. It's not until it happens close to home do people want to make anything happen...it's also about mental illness...guns really don't kill people it the people using them...let's make it harder to get them and not have freaky assault rifles available...but also get more into mental illness and seeing why it happens...solution? Put armed cops at schools? people say no way...well it already happens in SF...
kade January 02, 2013 at 05:55 AM
"Assault rifles'' are already banned becuase ''Assault rifles'' are full auto with a selector switch. civilains can own semi auto rifles that look like assault rifles. someone can do just as much killing to little kids with a long knife. i say no more laws. why are the good law biding citizens getting punished for someone else's screw up? WHY
boethius January 03, 2013 at 06:06 PM
Sandy Hook = America's Reichstag Fire. 'Nuf said.
Ron Wood January 08, 2013 at 10:28 PM
False. The current M-16 does not go "full auto" ,it can do a 3 rd burst. Any idiot knows a deer rifle like my brother's Remington,while accurate,is bolt action and after 8 shots,it takes a minute to reload. The Semi-Auto versions of an AK-47 or AK 74,a M-16 or it's copies...is STILL an asault rifle. In fact...many can be CONVERTED back to full auto with an illegal kit you can buy under the table at gun shows in Texas. Even so...Lantz COULD have went for body count,murdered 3 times more tots.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something