Novato Attorney Has Setback in Legal Action Against City, but Vows to Run for Council

One of Jerome Ghigliotti's lawsuits against the city is denied for reconsideration in Marin Superior Court, but another is filed in federal court.

Novato attorney Jerome Ghigliotti on Monday struck out again in Marin Superior Court in his effort to force a voter referendum onto the ballot that would change contract hiring practices by the city of Novato. But he’s not stopping there, and he’s running for Novato City Council to try and oust those who disagree with him.

Ghigliotti is appealing to the First District Court of Appeals in San Francisco to see if judges will agree with him that all contracted employees with the city — and all employees working for any company that contracts with the city — should have their immigration status checked first.

About 3,500 people last year to have a referendum placed on the election ballot in Novato, but City Attorney Jeffrey Walter contended that the initiative was unconstitutional and convinced the Novato City Council not to act on it. On Monday, Marin Superior Court Judge Lynn Duryee denied a motion to reconsider that favored Walter and the city.

“It’s a good initiative,” Ghigliotti said Monday. “They’re depriving us of our First Amendment rights. That’s why we have the First Amendment. The colonists believed it was the most important one. This is runaway fiat government, and they have no respect for citizens’ rights.”

On top of the lawsuit on the initiative, Ghigliotti has filed a suit in federal court against the members of the council — Mayor Madeline Kellner, Jeanne MacLeamy, Pat Eklund, Carole Dillon-Knutson and Denise Athas — plus Chief of Police Joseph Kreins for his treatment before the council in September 2010. Ghigliotti was arrested for disrupting a public meeting and escorted out of Novato City Hall, but he said his First Amendment rights were violated.

Ghigliotti said the city could delay the suit from appearing in federal court for almost a year, but it’s worth pursuing.

“Basically I just fill out the forms to say, ‘I’d really like you guys to take a look at this and tell me you agree with me,’” he said.

On Monday, the first day of the election nomination period, Ghigliotti said he went to the Novato city administrative offices and pulled papers to run for City Council. Seats occupied by Kellner, MacLeamy and Dillon-Knutson will be open in the November election. All three have stated their intention to run, according to the . City Clerk Sheri Hartz said Kellner and Ghigliotti picked up their candidate packets, but the filings are not official until the packets have been submitted.

Four other Novato residents — Manny Fernandez, Eric Lucan, Leslie Peterson Schwarze, and Eleanor Sluis — have indicated they will challenge for the seats, according to the IJ.

Ghigliotti said his underlying goal with his suits against the city is assure that anybody making a single cent of taxpayer money via city coffers is a legal resident of the United States. He maintains that there is no federal preemption on the E-Verify online system of immigration status checks and cited case law that supported his claim.

“The Supreme Court is clear that there is no federal conflict, and anything else Walter doesn’t like about the initiative doesn’t make it illegal,” Ghigliotti said. “Since it’s not illegal, it has to be put on the ballot.”

The ordinance drawn up by Ghigliotti, called the Novato Legal Employment and Contracting Initiative, deals with monetary penalties for those who do not comply, not licensing penalties. Walter cited that last month when explaining why the initiative was unconstitutional.

By law, referendums with the minimum amount of verified voter signatures must be placed on a ballot or enacted as an ordinance. Walter recommended the council not act at all, saying Ghigliotti’s ordinance was unconstitutional. The council did just that and found itself and was promptly sued by Ghigliotti.

Tom S Baker July 19, 2011 at 06:29 PM
Keep fighting them Jerome . We are all WITH you . This city does not listen to the people . Vote them out now !!!!!!
Matt McCarron July 19, 2011 at 07:51 PM
E-verify is not perfect either, just ask anyone from Arizona. The data that E-Verify uses is incomplete to do the job. This is strickly a contract manager for the City of Novato's responisbility. Every local contract has language that says that the contractor must obey the Federal, State and local laws and regulations. That contract manager for the city should check on his/her contractor when work is being preformed for the city. If they ramdomly ask contractors if all of there staff have I-9's on file, then they would know if they are illiegal or not. If the contract manager does not preform their job well, then disicpline them accordingly. Don't waste money on E-verify.
Steven Norwin July 19, 2011 at 09:39 PM
You are wrong. It's not a waste of money. It's the law and it should be abided! Good luck Jerome!
Jerome J Ghigliotti Jr August 18, 2011 at 01:48 PM
Walter either does not understand law or is lying, again. The monetary penalties are included in the same manner as late completion penalties. If they are, in fact, not permissible, then the severability clause in the initiative would allow those penalties to be excised from the ordinance and the exclusion from doing business with the city would still be applicable and enforceable. The US Supreme Court said that there is no federal preemption, as Walter previously claimed. That decision said that "licensing and similar laws" are permissible. When you have a license to do business, you do that in order to make a profit. Contract penalties take away some of the profit that a contractor was making with that license. Which still leaves the E-Verify requirement, that only persons permitted to work in the US can be hired on city contract jobs. Why does Walter and the incumbents want to preserve a contractors illegal act of hiring illegal aliens? That is what makes Novato a sanctuary city. The way that it acts. "Incumbent" is the four-letter of 2011.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »