.

Philosophical Differences Crystal Clear Between Congressional Candidates

Democrat Jared Huffman, Republican Dan Roberts debate at Dominican University in San Rafael.

Tiburon Republican Dan Roberts played the Mitt Romney card Monday night — emphasizing his private-sector business experience and bottom-up administrative philosophy — during a debate with San Rafael Democrat Jared Huffman, his opponent in the campaign for the 2nd District Congressional seat.

His viewpoint seemed to be this: Romney is gaining in the polls, so maybe it can work to his benefit as well.

The lightly attended event at Dominican University's Angelico Hall clearly showcased the differences between the two candidates vying for the position held for 20 years by the retiring Lynn Woolsey, a Democrat from Petaluma.

Roberts, a 41-year resident of the newly drawn district and the founder/president of an investment company, said his priorities would be to curtail excess government spending, cut taxes and eliminate unnecessary regulations that restrict the ability to start new businesses.

"The progressives, which include my opponent, have one theme that runs through all their approaches, and that is the old line of tax and spend," Roberts said in his closing statement. "If you listen to the rhetoric, they say invest in education and invest in light rail, and what they're talking about is spending. The pot is dry, and the free money is gone. Please help me problem-solve to find the right solutions that don't fall back on tax-and-spend."

Roberts said Huffman, an environmental attorney and six-year assemblyman, has been part of a Legislature that lost the trust of the public.

"My opponent is part of a failed government, one that's absent without leave," he said. "We need new leadership."

Huffman calmly admitted to the tough times in Sacramento but cited his track record of strong values, 60-plus pieces of legislation passed and the will to get things done, including overcoming partisan gridlock. He said his plan in Washington, D.C., would be to cut the military budget, protect Medicare and Social Security, build on affordable heath care, tackle the national debt and address global warming.

"But job creation and economic growth are the most important things," he said. "... the great news is that you have a six-year voting record to examine. I'm pro-consumer, pro-environment, pro-choice, pro-seniors."

Huffman said one of the biggest differences he has with Roberts is on funding for women's reproductive health care — he's for it and Roberts is against it. "I will fight any rollback on funding on that issue," Huffman said.

The forum was moderated by CBS 5 anchor Dana King and was co-sponsored by Dominican University, MarinKids, and the League of Women Voters of Marin County. Election day is Nov. 6.

Stay Patched in! Follow Novato Patch on Twitter | Like Novato Patch on Facebook | Sign up for the daily e-mail with links to the latest news.

DavethePragmatist October 10, 2012 at 05:41 AM
FROM Merriam-Webster on line - progressive - of, relating to, or characterized by progress. b : making use of or interested in new ideas, findings, or opportunities. Conservative - stuck in the mud, backwater, no forward movement, old and dusty While at it: liberal = freedom. Look it up!
DavethePragmatist October 10, 2012 at 05:46 AM
CBO announced today that the deficit is at a 6-yr low relative to the GNP. Yep, back to 2006...thus, the current administration has reversed the outrageous trend set up by the Republican White House of prior years. Oh, and the job hole has been reversed and net jobs have been created, and the stock market is near all time highs, and oh, let's see what else....But getting serious, tell us what outragous spending your Republican congress has allocated..after all, it is the Congress who has the financial check book for the country. But the last Repub White House called our two unfunded wars "emergency measures" thus keeping that extreme spending off the budget books for the Federal Government. So all you are doing is complaing about the "so called conservatives" who have lead to an outrageous spending of tax payer dollars. Thankfully, the Obama admin worked through an obstructionist Republican Congress to turn it around completely!!!!!!!
DavethePragmatist October 10, 2012 at 05:49 AM
Steve, so throw the baby out with the bathwater? Please tell us, because the conservatives on these blogs seldom do, what do you want to spend tax money on? Let's start from the ground up. Go for it. Tell us what you want to pay for.
DavethePragmatist October 10, 2012 at 05:50 AM
I'd gladly vote for Woolsey again! And I will vote for Obama again. Same question EWC, what do you want to spend tax money on? How much should we pay? Start from the ground up, What should we pay for collectively. Let's see how far the conservatives can go?
EWC October 11, 2012 at 05:51 PM
Dave: obviously you would vote for her. you're obviously tax and spend liberal who paid none or very little taxes and expect we tax payers who paid substantial sums of taxes to carry the burden for you.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »